Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan V Victoria Jayaseele Martin

Majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseele martin another appeal 2016 4 clj 12 fc 2016 1 lns 131 dynacast melaka sdn bhd ors v vision cast sdn bhd anor.

Majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseele martin. Ali mohamed ashgar ali 2012 professing the religion of islam as a requirement to be a syarie lawyer. The malaysian federal court in the case of majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseele martin 2016 1 lns 131 issued a landmark ruling whereby it held that only muslims may practise as syarie lawyers in the syariah courts in wilayah persekutuan kuala lumpur malaysia. The facts the applicant victoria jayaseele martin is an advocate and solicitor of the high court of malaya. Position of the law after the case of ahmad bin abd majeed v habihah bte abdul maiid anor by mohd badrol bin awang and maheran bt.

Victoria jayaseele martin and another appeal 2016 2 mlj 309. This landmark case raises the issue on whether a non muslim victoria jayaseele martin can be admitted as peguam syarie to represent parties in any proceedings before the syariah court in kuala lumpur. Victoria jayaseele martin v majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan anor by ashgar ali ali mohamed setting aside of the distribution order made under the small estates distribution act 1955 on the ground of fraud. Majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v.

Melalui permohonan yang difailkan pada 15 mei lalu victoria jayaseele martin juga meminta satu perintah certiorari bagi membatalkan keputusan majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan maiwp. Parties in judicial review public bodies case. The malaysian federal court in the case of majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseele martin 2016 1 lns 131. Malaysian court practice bulletin 2.

Majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v. Victoria jayaseele martin and another appeal 2016 2 mlj 309 this landmark case raises. In majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseele martin 2016 mlju 40 the question that arose for determination in the federal court was whether a non muslim possessing the requisite academic and professional qualifications could be admitted as a syariah practitioner. Majlis agama islam wilayah persekutuan v victoria jayaseela martin another 2016 1 lns 131.